PositiveSingles review

The non-public Variety of the new Specialist Questionnaire (PST-Q) was developed of the Fernandez-Alvarez mais aussi al

The non-public Variety of the new Specialist Questionnaire (PST-Q) was developed of the Fernandez-Alvarez mais aussi al

(2003), and you will was created to assess “brand new gang of features that every specialist can be applied in virtually any psychotherapeutic state, therefore shaping a portion of the popular features of the therapeutic work” (p. 117). The newest survey analyzes four other size: flexibility-rigidity (Educational subscale), distance-closeness (Expressive subscale), decreased wedding-greater engagement (Engagement subscale), greater focused-narrow focused (Attentional subscale) and you may spontaneous-planned (Surgical subscale). This is exactly an excellent thirty-six-goods mind-declaration measure filled out of the therapists having solutions rated to your an excellent size anywhere between step 1 (overall disagreement)so you can 7 (complete contract). New measure shows an examination-retest precision away from .79, which have Chronbach’s precision coefficients per subscale, as follows; instructional, .69; expressive, .75; wedding, .78; attentional, .80; surgical, .78. Grounds Research found an effective KMO = .756 (Look for Table step one for alphas in the present studies).

Doing work Alliance Inventory-Quick Mode (WAI-S)

The working Alliance Index (WAI), created by Horvath Greenberg (1986), is an excellent thirty-six items survey that can easily be applied to one another clients and practitioners that is rated towards good 7-part Likert kind of size from1 (never)so you can seven (always). Tracey and you can Kokotovic (1989) suggested an individual and you can specialist Doing work Alliance Catalog-Short Mode (WAI-S), which contains four factors each subscale (Activity, Mission, and you can Bond) and you will complete WAI-S score, showing large reliability with alpha profile similar to, and even a lot better than this new WAI to your therapist subscales and you can complete mediocre score (Activity, leader = .83; Thread, leader = .91; Objective, alpha = .88; and you will Standard Alliance, leader = .95). Look for Table step 1 to possess alphas in the current data.

Techniques Checklist (TL)

The strategy Record size try adjusted regarding Hollis (1995), who catalogued a comprehensive selection of counseling and you will therapy techniques representing a general spectrum of philosophical basics positivesingles reddit. So you’re able to refine that it comprehensive list predicated on process put especially from the cognitive behavioural and constructivist procedures orientations, we employed counseling mindset scholar people to read through the complete selection of 108 treatment procedure and you will rates brand new the amount to which for each and every method is employed by for each and every therapeutic means (intellectual behavioural and you may constructivist), using a 5-part Likert method of measure from 1 (Never ever or Rarely) in order to 5 (Always or Almost always).


Sixteen counseling psychology graduate students participated in these ratings (six men, 10 women), with the Mage = (SD = 2.67). Results of a paired differences analysis for all 108 items indicated that there were 77 techniques rated as being used with significantly differential frequency by cognitive behavioral and constructivist therapies. We then divided this distribution of 77 techniques into quartiles and retained the top and bottom quartiles. This resulted in 20 cognitive behavioral techniques (e.g.advice giving, rational restructuring) and 20 constructivist techniques (e.g. emotional processing, reflection) that were rated most significantly different (cognitive behavioral vs. constructivist). This final list of 40 items of therapy techniques (20 cognitive behavioral techniques; 20 constructivist techniques) was used in the current study.

These types of 40 items were noted alphabetically and participants was basically asked in order to price the brand new extent to which they use for every techniques within practice of procedures along a beneficial 5-area size from a single (Never otherwise Rarely)so you’re able to 5 (Always or Typically). The fresh studies of your 20 rationalist facts was summed and you may an effective indicate is calculated to mirror the typical frequency of employing rationalist treatments (you’ll diversity = 1-5), additionally the same techniques was used with regards to new 20 constructivist treatments.

The latest raw analysis was used to run a beneficial confirmatory foundation studies toward Processes Record level. The current investigation is actually looked at to own multi-variate normalcy therefore the presumptions were satisfied. All of the kurtosis quotes into details decrease anywhere between step 1 and you can –step one parameters but constructivist affairs a dozen, 13, sixteen, and 20 and you may cognitive behavioral goods step 3, which in fact had good kurtosis opinions between dos and –2. Thus, these types of five things was removed from the fresh scale just before powering the newest confirmatory foundation analysis.

Deixe um comentário

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *

Solve : *
8 + 17 =